Using `setjmp`, `longjmp`, and Signals to Catch Page Faults and Measure Performance
In C, catching a page fault using signals like SIGSEGV
(Segmentation Fault) is a powerful technique, especially when combined with setjmp
and longjmp
for error recovery. These functions allow us to implement non-local jumps in the program, saving and restoring the state of the execution context.
This approach is particularly useful when a segmentation fault occurs, and you want to avoid a complete program crash. In this blog, I’ll explain how setjmp
and longjmp
work, how they can be used with signal handling to catch page faults, and I’ll include some benchmarking code to measure the performance of these functions.
How setjmp
and longjmp
Work
setjmp
: Saves the current program state, including registers, program counter, and stack pointer, into ajmp_buf
buffer. When called, it returns 0.longjmp
: Jumps back to the state saved bysetjmp
. When it jumps back,setjmp
will return the value passed tolongjmp
instead of 0.
The combination of these functions allows a program to handle errors and recover from certain kinds of faults, such as illegal memory access or page faults.
Example Code: Using SIGSEGV
to Catch Page Faults
Here’s a basic example of using SIGSEGV
to catch a page fault and recover the program by using setjmp
and longjmp
.
1 |
|
Explanation:
- We use
signal(SIGSEGV, sigsegv_handler)
to register the signal handler. - In the signal handler, we use
longjmp(buf, 1)
to jump back to the saved state. - The program deliberately causes a segmentation fault by accessing invalid memory, but instead of crashing, the handler recovers by jumping back to the checkpoint set by
setjmp
.
Benchmarking the Performance of setjmp
and longjmp
To understand the cost of using setjmp
and longjmp
, we can measure their performance over multiple iterations. Below is a benchmarking example that tests both setjmp/longjmp
and setjmp
alone.
1 |
|
Performance Results:
After running this code with 1 million iterations, here are the results:
1 | Benchmarking setjmp/longjmp over 1000000 iterations, each 1 took 12.293 ns |
This shows that while longjmp
adds overhead, the performance is still acceptable for many use cases where non-local jumps are required for error handling.
Practical Considerations
Using setjmp
and longjmp
comes with caveats:
- Signal Safety: These functions should be used carefully within signal handlers. Specifically, non-local jumps can complicate the flow of the program and leave resources in an inconsistent state.
- Portability: Behavior might vary slightly between platforms. On some systems,
sigsetjmp
andsiglongjmp
are preferable for more precise control over signal masks【16†source】【17†source】.
Conclusion
By combining setjmp
, longjmp
, and signals, you can catch and recover from page faults in your C programs. While setjmp/longjmp
may add some overhead, they provide a powerful mechanism for handling errors gracefully without crashing the program. If you need to benchmark or optimize this approach, the above code can be a great starting point to understand the performance trade-offs.